Waiting For Tommy XXI
Interview with Mark Millar |
RICHARD:
Much of this style and attitude seems to have resulted
from taking 2000AD-suitable material and grafting it onto
some of America's most dearly loved superheroes. Can a genre
created to represent the best that people can be, be well-served
by a sensibility that shows the worst it can be?
MARK:
It tickles me that people refer to me as a 2000AD-style writer
because I HATED 2000AD growing up. It just seemed too dirty
and dangerous to me, which is interesting. I look back on
that stuff now and I love it, but I grew up on the same books
as Brian Bendis, Brian Vaughan and all the other American
creators who are around 30 years old. I'm a sucker for a happy
ending. I like things to be nice, but I don't mind seeing
everybody go through a shit-storm to get there. I'm interested
in drama and I like to juxtapose shocking art images with
amusing dialogue. I see a page as a little mini-exhibit. I'm
not cynical, as some people have suggested. I'm a utopian.
I'm a believer in a better world and I think my books are
generally about this. Sure, the characters are flawed, but
they're all idealists at heart and I think most people reading
them fall into this bracket. I know I certainly do.
RICHARD:
So how did it feel to write 2000AD, especially the
Summer Offensive, where you and Grant Morrison wrote pretty
much all of the scripts for a season... get any self-loathing
from it?
MARK:
It felt strange because I didn't read it growing up. I had
no idea what the characters were about or even really the
tone of the book until about half-way through my couple of
years there. The Summer Offensive (which Grant Morrison and
I did with John Smith and a bunch of our artist pals a few
years back) was huge because I think I was finally getting
the hang of it. Oddly enough, I think I'd do a good 2000AD
now. Frank Quitely and I would be very suited to that kind
of material, but I'd been raised on Curt Swan. 2000AD was
the opposite of what drew me to comics so it didn't appeal
to me as a teenager.
RICH:
You talked about Paul Levitz earlier... Levitz personally
organised an instant payment for DC work when your child was
seriously ill and accounts had lost one of your cheques. Are
your public comments concerning the man and his comics company
suitable for someone who went out of his way to help you and
your daughter so?
(Check
Out The Absolute Authority Vol.1 DC Hardcover Here...)
MARK:
The only reason you know this is because I've cited this as
an example of how Paul Levitz can be a nice guy, right? So
of course I've never set out to blacken a man's reputation.
I don't like personal attacks on people in the same way I
don't feel I should mouth off about other people's work because
it's below the belt and it affects their earning-capacity.
My old attacks on DC (and it's so long ago I genuinely couldn't
care less) were attacks on their company policy and a publishing
vision which I think was and is detrimental to an industry
I don't just happen to earn my living from, but which I also
love.
The Authority
was the fastest growing book in the market when all their
other books were sinking in sales and they killed it. As a
creator and as a reader, I just think that's an abomination
and it's why I wouldn't work there at the moment. But that's
just my personal decision and I don't suggest other people
do the same. I also think they're in a fantastic position
to reinvigorate a still-depressed market with their limitless
connections through Warners and AOL, but they purposely keep
their line trimmed because they earn nice salaries regardless
of whether there's a boom or a bust and they don't want to
attract the attention of their parent company or anyone else
who might want those highly-paid jobs. But, again, that's
none of my business. I don't work for them at the moment and
I have no intention of doing so for the time being, but that's
not to say they're evil people. Some of them are very, very
nice people. Paul, for all his faults, does a lot of stuff
behind the scenes to help out older creative people who built
the industry we're making a nice living from today.
When
a cheque of mine went missing for three weeks and accounts
said I'd have to wait a FURTHER six weeks to get my salary
from DC, Paul knew my wife and I already had a kid in hospital
and personally made sure that this cheque was wired to us
without delay. So I'm not attacking the individual. I NEVER
attack the individual. I just feel that guys like Bill and
Joe or Jim Valentino or whoever would capitalize on the enormity
of DC's potential much more than we're currently seeing. The
fact that the 3 most famous fictional characters in the world
are selling less than a Glasgow newspaper is just appalling
to me.
Continued
here...
|
|
|
|